<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schaeffer Against the World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mscottfoster.com/2009/07/23/schaeffer-against-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mscottfoster.com/2009/07/23/schaeffer-against-the-world/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Penrith</title>
		<link>http://mscottfoster.com/2009/07/23/schaeffer-against-the-world/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Penrith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mscottfoster.com/?p=58#comment-61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spot on. I&#039;m Dispensational so Erickson, Grudem and Ryrie are up my alley (I&#039;m admitting to bias). Calvin is a bit dusty for my time constraints.

Erickson&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Systematic Theology&lt;/i&gt; is very easy read (not as simply put as Grudem but succinct enough to make it onto my shelf).

I get you point re Keller.

Thanks for the response.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on. I&#8217;m Dispensational so Erickson, Grudem and Ryrie are up my alley (I&#8217;m admitting to bias). Calvin is a bit dusty for my time constraints.</p>
<p>Erickson&#8217;s <i>Systematic Theology</i> is very easy read (not as simply put as Grudem but succinct enough to make it onto my shelf).</p>
<p>I get you point re Keller.</p>
<p>Thanks for the response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Scott Foster</title>
		<link>http://mscottfoster.com/2009/07/23/schaeffer-against-the-world/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M. Scott Foster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 19:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mscottfoster.com/?p=58#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Frame, John Calvin, and Thomas Watson would be my favorite theologians. Believe it or not, Frame is even more brief than Grudem. 

I&#039;ve barely read any of Erickson&#039;s stuff. What of his works do you recommend?

Tim Keller is definitely a brother but brothers aren&#039;t above reproof. He is incredibly weak on all things related to sexuality (e.g. homosexuality, abortion, masculinity, feminism, etc). 

My point wasn&#039;t to write Keller off as a heretic like Bell. I have benefited greatly from him. However, we mustn&#039;t let Christian celebrity status cloud our ability or, more precisely, willingness to discern.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Frame, John Calvin, and Thomas Watson would be my favorite theologians. Believe it or not, Frame is even more brief than Grudem. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve barely read any of Erickson&#8217;s stuff. What of his works do you recommend?</p>
<p>Tim Keller is definitely a brother but brothers aren&#8217;t above reproof. He is incredibly weak on all things related to sexuality (e.g. homosexuality, abortion, masculinity, feminism, etc). </p>
<p>My point wasn&#8217;t to write Keller off as a heretic like Bell. I have benefited greatly from him. However, we mustn&#8217;t let Christian celebrity status cloud our ability or, more precisely, willingness to discern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Penrith</title>
		<link>http://mscottfoster.com/2009/07/23/schaeffer-against-the-world/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Penrith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 18:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mscottfoster.com/?p=58#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schaeffer occupies a shelf as good as any other. I prefer the simplicity of Ryrie, brevity of Grudem or balance of Erickson but each to their own.

mmm, I also thought Keller was one of the good guys. Read MOM at the beginning of the year and thought it a good introduction to Mercy Ministries?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schaeffer occupies a shelf as good as any other. I prefer the simplicity of Ryrie, brevity of Grudem or balance of Erickson but each to their own.</p>
<p>mmm, I also thought Keller was one of the good guys. Read MOM at the beginning of the year and thought it a good introduction to Mercy Ministries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://mscottfoster.com/2009/07/23/schaeffer-against-the-world/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mscottfoster.com/?p=58#comment-23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You wrote: &quot;This means we might have to take issue with some or even most of the popular theologians and pastors such as Rob Bell, Tim Keller, and N.T. Wright.&quot;

May you please expand on this? There is plenty of evidence for why Bell and Wright would have received opposition from Schaeffer, but I&#039;d like to know what issue you see with Keller that would cause you to add him to that list.

I agree, and I&#039;ve noticed some very questionable teachings from Keller such as his 2 Gospels and frequent appeal to Roman Catholics and existential philosophers, but what have you found?

Hope to hear back!

JG]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote: &#8220;This means we might have to take issue with some or even most of the popular theologians and pastors such as Rob Bell, Tim Keller, and N.T. Wright.&#8221;</p>
<p>May you please expand on this? There is plenty of evidence for why Bell and Wright would have received opposition from Schaeffer, but I&#8217;d like to know what issue you see with Keller that would cause you to add him to that list.</p>
<p>I agree, and I&#8217;ve noticed some very questionable teachings from Keller such as his 2 Gospels and frequent appeal to Roman Catholics and existential philosophers, but what have you found?</p>
<p>Hope to hear back!</p>
<p>JG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

