Author Archives: M. Scott Foster

Blackjack & Luke 22:32

Once upon a time (’06 – ’08), I played on a professional card-counting team (i.e. blackjack) called the Church Team because a lot of us were professing Christians. Someone made a documentary about it called Holy Rollers: The True Story of Christian Card-Counting. I appeared in this movie. You can read some of my thoughts on it here.

Yes. I realize this whole thing is ridiculous. I’m glad it is over. I’m glad they made a movie about it so I can’t escape dealing with the sin in my past. There was a lot deception. I brought reproach on the gospel. I probably lead others in sin. It was wrong. There was some good too but, all the same, I repent.

The Discipline of Feeding on Jesus

What is the first thing you do when you wake up in the morning? The odds are good that you check your Facebook account if you are an American. Over half of the residents of the United States have a Facebook account. According to several recent studies, nearly half of all these users check their account before they do anything else in the morning. It would be naive to think that these percentages are much different in the Christian community. The church, just like the world, logs onto Facebook before they pour their coffee or orange juice.  Facebook’s rolling aggregate of status updates is aptly called the Newsfeed. This is where breakfast truly begins. Every morning, Christians wirelessly line up to a trough of narcissism and absurdity. We feed our self-loving egos with likes, shares, and comments. We are miles away from the heart of King David who wrote, “O God, you are my God; early will I seek you: my soul thirsts for you, my flesh longs for you in a dry and thirsty land, where no water is.” Everyone hungers. God didn’t create mankind in such a way that he can sustain himself. We will die if we don’t routinely feed. This is true of our race both physically and spiritually. We see this reality clearly demonstrated in the Old Testament type of manna which finds it fulfillment in the true and better bread, Jesus Christ… Continue reading

The End of Down Syndrome

A day is coming when we will eliminate Down Syndrome, Spina Bifida, and all other forms of birth defects. It won’t happen because we discover some miracle cure in the Amazon. We will just kill them before they are even born.

I got thinking about this a lot last year when I listened to an episode of the Freakonomic’s podcast on “population planning.” The bulk of the podcast was dedicated to explaining the unlikely origins of China’s one child policy. This alone makes the podcast worth a listen but it was a short story tacked on at the end that really disturbed me. Here is its synopsis from Freakonomic dot com:

Finally, we talk to Stanford researcher Stephen Quake about a new blood test that can help pregnant women learn if their babies are likely to be born with Down Syndrome. This leads to yet another moral dilemma in baby-making: as parents can learn more and more about what’s in the womb, what kind of decisions will they make? And what will the consequences be decades later?

The answer to those last two questions should be obvious to anyone. What kind of decisions will they make if they find out their baby has down syndrome? They will abort their child. And what will the consequences be decades later? We will eliminate the world of down syndrome and all other birth defects. The West hates the weak, sick, and elderly. Quake’s test will help us move a little closer to ridding us of these troublesome barriers to pleasure.

Do you doubt it? Continue reading

Sanger’s Bloody Legacy

Margaret Sanger was a godless racist. So what? Why does it matter? The world is full of godless racists, right? While yes it is but only a few of them had the evil drive to put to their commitments to work on a large scale. Adolf Hitler did it. Slobodan Milosevic did it. But…Sanger’s legacy puts both to shame. After all, the founder of Plan Parenthood is responsible for inspiring the murder of countless millions–many of them from minority households. Her DNA still is at the core of Plan Parenthood’s mission and the wider abortion movement. Here are just a few quotes from Sanger that demonstrates the wicked worldview that lies at the heart of Western society’s love of child slaughter.

“[Our objective is] unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children … [Women must have the right] to live … to love … to be lazy … to be an unmarried mother … to create … to destroy … The marriage bed is the most degenerative influence in the social order … The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

– Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel , Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race . New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal.We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

– Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America . New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

Continue reading

Jesus Christ vs. American Christianity

“Christ calls men to carry a cross; we call them to have fun in His name. He calls them to forsake the world; we assure them that if they but accept Jesus the world is their oyster. He calls them to suffer; we call them to enjoy all the bourgeois comforts modern civilization affords…He calls them to holiness; we call them to a cheap and tawdry happiness that would have been rejected with scorn by the least of the Stoic philosophers.” A.W. Tozer

Why We Hate Fertility

“Although it is very easy to marry a wife, it is very difficult to support her along with the children and the household. Accordingly, no one notices this faith of Jacob. Indeed, many hate fertility in a wife for the sole reason that the offspring must be supported and brought up. For this is what they commonly say: ‘Why should I marry a wife when I am a pauper and a beggar? I would rather bear the burden of poverty alone and not load myself with misery and want.’ But this blame is unjustly fastened on marriage and fruitfulness. Indeed, you are indicting your unbelief by distrusting God’s goodness, and you are bringing greater misery upon yourself by disparaging God’s blessing. For if you had trust in God’s grace and promises, you would undoubtedly be supported. But because you do not hope in the Lord, you will never prosper.” Martin Luther, The Sermons of Martin Luther

This Week in Sexuality

20120121-173425.jpgThis Saturday marks the starts of my “This Week in Sexuality” weekly feature. Every Saturday I will spotlight the “sexuality” stories I came across in the previous seven days.

Real Marriage
 
The biggest sexuality story hands down has been the release of Mark Driscoll’s Real Marriage. The book has barely been out two weeks and it already has just shy of an hundred reviews on Amazon. Egalatarians hate the book because Driscoll is a complementarian and believes in “traditional” marriage. No shocker there. However, the book is even getting mixed reviews from people that are in basic theological alignment with the Seattle pastor. A lot of the controversey stems from the fact that the book has a seemingly inordinate amount of its content dedicated sexual intercourse and various sex acts. I have yet to read the book but I do recall Driscoll’s teaching on the Song of Solomon being fairly messed up. I do eventually plan to pick up since it will be a significant influence on Christians.
 
Here are some of the better reviews I came across:
  • Deny Burk has lengthy review here.
  • Tim Challies has a short review here.
  • Doug Wilson did a mutli-parter: pt. 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5.
Sidenote: The best book I’ve read on marriage so far is Doug Wilson’s Reforming Marriage. I’d recommend Ed Wheat’s Intended for Pleasure if you are looking for something that focuses on the sex act.
 
Babies are Good
 
Mark Oppenheimer’s latest article in the New York Times on Evangelicals shifting their views regarding contraception is worth checking. Here is a short quote:
“Since then, however, there has been a shift in evangelical thinking about contraception, and therefore about big families. You can see it in the Duggar family, the enthusiastic Santorum supporters who star on the reality television show “19 Kids & Counting.” You can read about it in books like “Quiverfull,” Kathryn Joyce’s 2009 account of Christians who forgo contraception to add children to the Lord’s army. And you can hear it in the teachings of theologians like Russell D. Moore, the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary dean who warns evangelicals to be skeptical of the ‘contraceptive culture.’”

Love and War

“The Bible is a cosmic love story, to be sure. At the end of The Book, Christ “gets the girl”–the bridal city that He desires. But history is also a war story. In it God proves Himself the best, the only one worthy to reign, by crushing all rivals and enemies in a just and righteous wrath.” William E.Mouser, The Story of Sex in Scripture pg. 21

John Calvin on Abortion

The Reformers spoke up for the unborn. Will you?

“The fetus, though enclosed in the womb of its mother, is already a human being and it is a most monstrous crime to rob it of the life which it has not yet begun to enjoy. If it seems more horrible to kill a man in his own house than in a field, because a man’s house is his place of most secure refuge, it ought surely to be deemed more atrocious to destroy a fetus in the womb before it has come to light” John Calvin, Commentarius in Exodum, 21,2

Sex is Not Safe

“As [Wendell Berry] writes in the splendid essay, “Sex, Economy, Freedom, and Community”: “Sex was never safe, and it is less safe now than it has been.” Community customs, arrangements, and controls had existed “in part, to reduce the volatility and the danger of sex.” These controls would preserve its energy, its beauty, and its pleasure” so that the sexual act would in turn bond husbands to wives, “parents to children, families to community, [and] the community to nature.” Whenever sex becomes “autonomous,” freed from communal restraints, and valued solely for its own sake, it also becomes “frivolous” and “destructive–even of itself.”

“Rather than freedom the disintegration of the household through “sexual liberation” has produced a novel form of bondage. The new overlords, Mr. Berry says, are the sexual specialists–sex clinicians and pornographers–”[b]oth of whom subsist on the increasing possibility of sex between people who neither know or care about each other” and who also “subsist on our failure to see any purpose or virtue in sexual discipline.”

Allan Carlson. “Not Safe, Nor Private, Nor Free: Wendell Berry on Sexual Love and Procreation.” The Family in America. Sept-Oct 2007.